Showing posts with label Personal narrative. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Personal narrative. Show all posts

Thursday, August 19, 2021

Is Owning a Camper in my Future? (August 19, 2021)


 

When my sister and brother-in-law drove up with their new RV last year, my heart inexplicably did a little pitter-patter.  I’m in that class of adults whose last camping experience was when my children were little.  It was fun, but then it stopped being fun when they grumbled about having to be separated from their friends (if said friends were not invited along, and since I preferred keeping things simple, their friends were typically not invited.) And the last time before that when I thought camping was fun was when I was little.  It, too, ceased to be fun when I began to prefer the company of my friends who, of course, were not allowed to join us.

Now, in the early morning as I sip my coffee, my relaxing ritual of conjuring both ventures and adventures yet explored includes the camping life.  It seems necessary to point out here that I am a regular visitor at the Salisbury Beach State Reservation, an enormously popular camping destination, and I love it. . . in the winter. . . when few people are present and the space between is far enough so conversation would be inconvenient.*  (To learn a little bit about the history of Salisbury Beach, read my post “Salisbury Beach’s Original South End” - http://scoscheofclass.blogspot.com/2021/02/salisbury-beachs-original-south-end.html.)  

 

I think what I like best about the idea of camping - even more than the opportunity to enjoy nature - is the ease of being alone among people.  (I bet I was really good at parallel play when I was a toddler.)  In my morning musings I make all kinds of mental lists - places I’d like to visit, RV options, outdoor activities that complement my personality, necessary gear, recipe ideas, and cute names for my camper, to name a few.  It seems that each day, my thinking about camping expands, which tells me that it’s time to make my lists more durable and seriously weigh all the pros and cons.  In other words, I think I’m getting serious about joining the itinerant community.  It might just be my wildest dream to date, but I see myself crossing the United States in a camper with my little doggies, finally seeing our country’s interior and furthest reaches for the first time.  I’d love to be able to take in the majesty of natural wonders such as the Grand Canyon, the Badlands, and the Redwood Forest.  In the meantime, as I’ve been counseled by a well-meaning sister, I should “try before I buy”.  This weekend will be my first return to camping in over 25 years.  It’s debatable whether it truly classifies as camping; I’m doing the “glamping” thing.  As you can see, I’m easing myself in nice and slow!  And, as part of my efforts at self-improvement, whereby I endeavor to counteract my solitary tendencies, I will set an arbitrary goal of meeting and talking to at least four strangers. . . the safe-looking ones, not the creepy-looking ones.  It’s a process.  (Tom and Marg will be nearby, so I needn’t feel threatened. . . and if you know Tom, the chances are high that we’ll be meeting all kinds of new people.)

 

Here’s one list (in no particular order; it includes only places I’ve never been):

 

“Places I’d Like to Visit”. (or “Things I’d Like to See”)

  • Niagara Falls, NY
  • Hudson Valley, NY
  • Redwood Forest, CA
  • The Grand Tetons, WY
  • Lincoln’s Tomb, IL
  • Shenandoah Valley, VA
  • Lewis & Clark National Historical Park, OR
  • Grand Canyon, AZ
  • Gettysburg, PA
  • Key West, FL

 

Feel free to offer one of your own suggestions for places to visit. 

(I’ll keep y’all posted on how the weekend goes; the good, the bad, and the ugly.)   


*To be fair (to myself, at least), I do enjoy the company of others, but in small doses.  These days, people exhaust me, and so, whenever I have plans to be with friends or family, I have to have an exit strategy already formulated.  Many are the times that I abruptly and clumsily take my leave, causing others to wonder if they might have said or done something that caused me offence.  Nope, it’s (almost) never the case that they have behaved badly; it’s just that my threshold has been reached.  I’m working out the reasons why this is the case and why it seems more exaggerated at this stage of my life, but I’ll leave that deconstruction for later.

Friday, February 5, 2021

The Perennial Neophyte

 I. The McKennas Arrive in Salisbury, the Year is 1985

When my husband George and I first moved to Salisbury, Massachusetts in October of 1985, from the moment of arrival I felt we’d made a mistake.  No, that’s not quite true.  My doubts had already been growing during all the negotiations leading up to that day.  The homeowners selling the house made the process impossibly unpleasant, and as there was no broker in between us, hence no voice of reason nor any way to blunt all their miserableness, we endured a steady barrage of sheer meanness right through the closing. 

 

The skeptics among you are probably right now thinking, it takes two to tango.  Fair point.  The only thing that might have contributed to the sellers’ looniness was my husband’s plodding pace.  George was a shrewd consumer, and no one, absolutely NO ONE, was going to rush his first home purchase.

 

Perhaps, too, you’re not getting the most honest assessment from me regarding their behavior.  Were they really that unpleasant, really that mean?  I’ll allow that, being in my final trimester of pregnancy with my second daughter, some of my actions weren’t characterized by reasonableness.  And we were already running out the clock on our eviction.  Ok, I realize that that last statement in no way casts a more favorable light on me (or us, because George was in that bucket with me).  Disclaimer: the eviction was a planned one; the landlords were selling the house, and the new owners were doing a complete renovation.  Hopefully, I’ve cleared that up so there are no lingering reservations.

 

As I began to say (and then proceeded to dig myself into a good-size hole), I was thinking that we’d made a mistake in moving to Salisbury.   The day we moved in, George arrived in the rental truck with most of our possessions just ahead of me.  I was following a couple minutes behind in our pick-up truck.  We didn’t have a ton of stuff, primarily infant and toddler toys and accessories.  When I pulled up the long serpentine driveway and put the truck in park, my older daughter, just four years old, leaped from the passenger side and began to run toward the truck.  As she was running, I saw the rental truck’s back-up lights go on, and George began, inexplicably, to back the truck.  I think I blared my horn.  To this day I’m not even sure.  I can’t hear it in my mind’s recollection of that terrifying moment.  I have no trouble envisioning my tiny daughter right behind the truck, with raised arms; to each side of her, a frighteningly ominous round white glow.  Was she suddenly aware that the truck was backing up and, therefore, trying to signal, STOP!  Or had she raised her arms to be scooped up by her daddy?  The truck bobbed as George put it back in park, and hopped out.  He hadn’t heard or seen anything.  He had simply changed his mind about backing up.  The scene replayed in my head for months.  I still get slightly nauseous thinking about that day and what if.  So, yes, I was convinced we’d made a mistake moving to Salisbury.


II.  A Blank, Asphalt-Surfaced Canvas

 

Neither of us had a point of reference for our new community.  Salisbury, Massachusetts.  I’d never so much as passed through the town.  George had only a hazy recollection of having visited the beach in his early days as a student at North Shore Community College.  It wasn’t even clear to us what or where the Merrimack Valley was.  Whatever it was, it had to be better than the affordable neighborhoods we had been looking at for several months on the North Shore; who wants to live beside a river made toxic by a long history of tannery dumping?  Or a house that sits simultaneously at the edge of a good neighborhood and the edge of a bad neighborhood with the highest robbery rate in the city?  These were houses we could afford.  

 

Based on a brief introduction to the house in Salisbury and the lot it sat on, we enthusiastically shook hands with the sellers, I’ll call them Cheswick and Betty Finch, and began a new chapter.  And even though they were moving to a shiny new house (the second one that Cheswick had built) a couple of miles away, they radiated signs of unspoken regret.  As we gradually came to know our house, I couldn’t help but feel that we had taken over their “dream” house, the house where early on they had constructed their dreams, and much later on dismantled them.  Cheswick and Betty had moved into their new little ranch home at the same age as we were when we moved in.  One difference, one that I often wondered about over the years, was:  had they not wanted children; was that a choice?  Of course, before my heart had had a chance to soften toward them, I thought, thank goodness they never had kids; can you imagine having them as parents?  It was an unkind thought, I know.

 

Located in the Plains section of Salisbury, the northern "uplands" sector of the town, our house was amusingly referred to as “The Backwards House”, which we knew before we signed, and while that particular didn’t concern us – in fact, we ourselves found it quite humorous and endearing – the sellers were indignant about the moniker. The Finches had finished construction of the 4-room ranch house in 1950, right before crews for the Massachusetts Department of Public Works leaned into their shovels in the final construction project of the “Relocated Route 1”, (a 21-mile stretch of expressway, later renamed Route I-95 to better align with the naming conventions for the entire eastern continental network).  It would result in the taking of the homeowners’ front yard for Massachusetts’ last exit ramps onto and off of the Northeast Expressway, just shy of the connection with the New Hampshire Turnpike.  As George and I saw it, the prickliness that we observed throughout the real estate negotiations must have had its beginnings when they were forced to hand over their front yard.  (Think about it, not an insignificant back corner of their 1+ acre lot, but their front yard).  They mentioned this detail more than once.    The forced taking of land was not the only source of their discontent. . . as we would soon learn.

 

George and I happily set about making the little ranch our home.  We weren’t guilty of too many first-home ownership mistakes, but we did go a little nuts with paint and wallpaper.  We didn’t, however, throw up a line of trees or a fence to make clear to everyone where our boundaries were, as people sometimes do, as if their new proprietary role were in some way a tenuous one, and they need defining lines to announce, here to here; that’s the McKennas’ property.  There were enough trees already sprinkled about the lot, with denser vegetation at the borders, and well-established shrubbery and flowers.  Both my city-boy husband and I were satisfied with the country feel of the place.  

 

Where our lot lines began and ended was of significance at the outset.  George and I quickly learned that a couple who owned property further down the street had discovered that they had no access to some of their acreage.  Roy and Alice Cheney had used the courts to adjudicate the matter, but lost, even after appeal.  This had all happened before we came on the scene.

 

With neither delay nor a welcoming floral arrangement in hand, Roy and Alice approached us about deeding them a right-of-way.  Politely we refused.  We were happy with our new property, and a bit skeptical of this brusque, bossy couple.  It was with a few misgivings, then, that George agreed to have a sit-down with them in our kitchen; I was at work, and, anyway, had no interest in listening to their carefully scripted argument as to why we should part with a small segment of our lot.  Let me just say – yes, even overstate – that I WASN’T THERE while my husband recorded the meeting; I cannot be held responsible for violating the two-party consent law.  And this is what you need to appreciate:  two very large human beings entered our miniscule “dining room” (which is what the Finches had called the 5’ x 5’ corner of our kitchen when they had defended their ad for a “5-room ranch-style home” that was no more than a 4-room ranch-style home), and laid out their reasons why we should grant them – thuggish bullies used to getting their way – a right of way, one that would give us a modest clutch of tens and twenties, and virtually nothing else.  How I knew – innocently – about the proceedings is because. . . I called in the middle of them.  At this point George was in a sweat because it had occurred to him that his camcorder, a device no smaller than a dairy cow – it was, after all, 1986 – hidden in a house plant, which also would have been massive in size to adequately camouflage the dairy cow, would soon begin emitting a beep-beep-beep to signal a dying battery.  At this point you might be wondering to what end were we recording a discovery-type conversation, to which I can only say we were naïve real estate newbies and, as such, uncertain about our homeowner status.

 

George held his ground; he was, after all, a man with an unparalleled sense of reason.  And while we dodged something early on that will always remain a little bit undefined, what we quickly came to understand within the walls of the backwards house was that the Cheneys and the Finches were locked in a bitter, never-ending feud.  For our part, we simply wanted to prune the rhododendrons, plant new things like azaleas (and then transplant when we realized that placing them underneath a basketball hoop was ill-advised), and re-surface – together – the only asphalt-surfaced driveway in the neighborhood.  

 

The hard-surface driveway was our means to meet all the kids in the neighborhood.  There’s always heightened curiosity when someone new moves into the neighborhood.  Do they have kids?  Are they friendly?  Will they let us use their driveway to skateboard on or ride our bikes on?  The Finches had never allowed anyone on their driveway – especially if you were a human being under the age of, say, 21.  Josh was the first kid we met on our street; he was cheerful, adept at handling adults, and very direct; he wanted to know, would we be okay if kids used our driveway.  (Why wouldn’t we be?)  And, that, of course, altered the course of history.  Within hours, our driveway became the nexus of all manner of kid-centered activities.  You have no idea how imaginative a brigade of 10-year olds (or so) can be in the context of an asphalt-surfaced driveway, on a dirt road, no less.  Of a sudden, our driveway thrummed with bicycles, big-wheels, jump-ropes, skip-its, pogo-balls, and colored chalk.  

 

And I smiled.  This is exactly the kind of dream I had imagined.


III.  I Quit!


It hadn’t been part of the plan that George and I would move to a new home, fill all the rooms with our old, featureless furniture, and then begin negotiations.  Life wasn’t getting simpler (does it ever?), now that we had a new home, new baby, and a more challenging commute.  (The commute wasn’t really all that more challenging).  Imagine the couple who sinks all their savings into a down payment for their first home purchase, and then the wife says, “Honey, I’m quitting my job.”  But here’s the thing: with the birth of each of my girls, it was obvious - to me and everyone I worked closely with - that I had in both cases returned to work way too soon.  My older daughter had been 8 weeks old when I began the daily hand-off; not ideal, but not too impossible; my second daughter was 4 weeks old, and that nearly put me around the bend.  In neither case did I have daycare that met my expectations.  Even now, when one or the other of my girls exhibits anything but the most well-adjusted behavior, I secretly attribute it to an imagined trauma inflicted by a care provider that we should have vetted more carefully.  Is anyone really good enough for that job?  Nope, not unless it’s the child’s own parent, right?  Thus, within weeks of the move, I would give my notice at the insurance company where I worked in Salem.


                    *          *          *

 

For parents of young children, the 1980’s were, in some ways, “in-between” years; according to the Bureau of Labor & Statistics, by 1980 the percentage of families with both parents working had tipped into the majority, yet the constructs and support systems that young families were desperate for in order to sustain that type of lifestyle were still years away from being fixed or reliable features of family life.  Without any dependable mechanisms designed specifically to alleviate the stresses that accompanied the dual roles of parenting and full-time work, it’s no wonder, then, that at that same point in time more women were choosing to delay pregnancy, even repudiate the whole thing.  For our generation, the two words “working” and “mother” were conjoined, and that became the norm.   Regrettably, it was left to these babes in the wood to figure out how to make it all work.  

 

Forty years later, our country still lags in accommodating young families.  For example, as of 2021, we’re the only industrialized nation that has no permanent paid family leave policy.  Having navigated those troublesome waters long ago, I still would maintain that it is a pretty sizable omission.  We do have an unpaid family leave policy, one that provides an out for companies with fewer than 50 employees.  It is at least somewhat heartening to know, however, that of late, businesses have been relaxing their oppositional stance; an overwhelming majority now are in favor of a government leave plan.  It has perhaps taken a pandemic for employers to concede that, apart from ethical reasons, offering paid family leave makes practical business sense.


                                                                    *          *          *

 

It may be that under more forgiving circumstances, I would have stayed on at the insurance company.  As it was, however, I was performing a menial job with rigid work hours and low pay, and I had yet to make any meaningful and lasting connections with any of the people with whom I was working (even after six years).  (What that in itself says about me is a topic best covered in sessions with a therapist, which I currently don’t have, so I can’t say “my therapist”).  While it was easy for me to walk away from my claims rep job, the decision to become a stay-at-home mom was one that George and I arrived at together, of course.  

 

It must be said that from the moment we met, George and I enjoyed great conversations.  It was really the first time that I was in a relationship with someone who cared what I thought and believed, who (like my mother, but unlike me) thought I was smart and could do anything I set my mind to. Moreover, my guy was refreshingly “in touch with his own feelings”.  We had such deep conversations.  It was intoxicating.  This city boy, whose ambitions far exceeded the expectations of a father who dropped out of school in the tenth grade and a mother who regularly - and happily - kept us in the loop about her marriages by means of informally scrawled postcards, had fierce survival instincts.  Be that as it may, inner doubts sometimes kept him silent.  

 

For my part, in the early years I wasn’t an empowered, confident woman; I very much took my cues from George.  And while I’d like to think that I simply presented the most compelling reasons as to why I should quit my job, there very well could have been an undisclosed variable, a secret reason why George was open to my impassioned appeal.  (If so, it was just one among many private thoughts that he would take to the grave with him.)  Thus, I broke ranks with my generation, an entire cohort that was eschewing the traditional family dynamic.  Put another way, at the very moment in history when the traditional family became a minority class, when even the term “traditional family” became obsolete, I was re-creating that construct for my own little family.  I reveled in my new role as stay-at-home mom; it scarcely mattered - at least at first - that I lived in a working-class neighborhood where nearly every adult worked full time.  In my compact world life was simple and tidy.  I’ve never been one who thrives on complexity and fast-paced activity; I’m not even a quick thinker.   Viewed now from a distance of 35 years and a lifetime of gathering experience and wisdom, I can confidently say that I was my happiest version in the four years (between 1985 and 1989) that I orchestrated and led the McKenna Family Experiment.  

Monday, November 18, 2019

Dear Ms. Yovanovitch

Institute for the Study of Diplomacy
Georgetown University
1316 36th St. NW
Washington, DC. 20007

Attention:  Marie Yovanovitch

Dear Ms. Yovanovitch,

I grew up in a rural area in southeast Massachusetts, always aware - and proud - that both my parents served in the U.S. Army with active assignments in Europe and the Pacific during WW2.  Their commissioned officer status - my mom was a first lieutenant and my dad was a major - kept me in awe, a feeling that to this day can still sweep over me. . . and remind me of the honor owed to those who both represent our national and security interests, and who put themselves out there. . . literally.

It wasn't until I was a teenager that my curiosity about the details of my parents' service "tenure" took real hold.  I asked questions, principally of my mother because she was more approachable and willing to reflect on that episode of her life.  Often using her war album as a reference point, I would study a single picture or series of related ones, and probe until I could imagine an entire scene.   My mother ultimately gifted me her album, and it remains one of my most treasured possessions, a fact made even more humbling when taking into account that I am one of seven children.  Some years ago, my sister and I collaborated on a project to contextualize the album.  Our objective was to synthesize our mom’s war experiences, impart the story (in pictorial fashion), so that all of us had a permanent record and understanding of Margaret Gildea’s ww2 service.  We scanned every photograph and provided details and back-stories to flesh out her experiences in places like Mindanao, Philippines (where she developed an abiding distaste for mangos!), and the reception hospital in Namur, Belgium, and as part of the occupation/reconstruction efforts in Japan post-war. 

Sitting one day on my mother’s living room sofa in the home she shared with her sister on Cape Cod, I once again was perusing her war album, when a loose photo slid into my lap.  I may have seen it before, but never paid close attention to it; after all, it didn’t fit with the time sequence.  It featured two brothers, one who appeared to be about eight years old, the other maybe about five or six.  They were, in fact, twins.  Her first comment was, “Look at those shorts – so French!”  Then the story’s origins spilled out.  My mother was a dietitian, so one of her assigned roles in the final days leading up to VE Day was to plan and organize meals for thousands upon thousands of severely under- and mal-nourished POW’s, who had been recently released from the Nazi camps.  One morning a Belgian woman arrived at the gates, holding her two small babies in her arms, and pleading – in French – for help.  Her distress readily made an impression on the guards, but they didn’t understand French; they sent her away.  She returned very shortly and again appealed to the guards.  My mother was immediately summoned, as she was fluent in French.  She succeeded (much against strict military protocol) in getting a doctor to examine the baby, who was extremely ill with some type of infectious disease.  As the baby was close to death, the doctor administered penicillin, which I’m sure you know was in short supply by this point in the war in Europe.  The baby survived, and photos of my mom holding a then happy baby serve as evidence.  So, what was this outlier photo, taken at a later date (perhaps in the early 1950’s) , doing in her album?  My mom explained that the Belgian mother communicated with her after the war; in one of her letters, she had included a photo of the twins, one boy much smaller and less robust than the other; in fact, he looked like a much younger brother.  Flawinne, nicknamed “Coco,” had survived his medical ordeal.  As you can imagine, the Belgian mother was deeply suffused with gratitude that one Allied soldier had opened her heart to another woman’s desperation and despair, and was willing to set aside protocol and rules.  It was a curious departure, for my mom always and strenuously maintained that she was a compliant follower of rules!  I can’t help but imagine that there is a Belgique man out there, in his mid-70’s, a slight man (perhaps accustomed to wearing tight, high-waisted shorts), who answers to the name Flawinne. . . or Coco!

As much as my parents viewed their wartime service as one of life’s distractions, nothing they could say – or not say – could undo the evident value that they placed on patriotism and service to one’s country, and the lifelong sense of caution that arises when authoritarianism threatens our very security.

I don’t wish to suggest that their experiences mirror your own.  One could say, different time, different place, different mitigating circumstances, different context.  Yet, when I consider your testimony of last week, it is not lost on me that you appreciate – more keenly than the average citizen, and evidently much more keenly than several of your questioners – the fragility of democracy.  You strike me as an extraordinarily honest foreign service careerist; that anyone would feel so emboldened as to characterize you as “bad news”, and remove you without cause must shake your faith.  I’m not expecting that you would feel it necessary to defend against such an odious and baseless accusation; you’re way better than that.  It troubles me greatly, however, that there appear to be no sensible measures that can effectively put a stop to this alarming trend.  I have scant confidence that this will resolve satisfactorily because I hear the confounding rationalizations and defenses of politicians who are most concerned with holding onto their seats.  We have a dangerous president in Donald Trump; his every action makes me want to kick and throw things.  How do you stay positive?  How do you, after being knocked down, pick yourself up and march forward with renewed conviction?  You must surely have a personal mantra that serves you in moments like these!

I am compelled to say how sorry I am that you’ve had to endure this nonsense, but I also sense how trite that must seem.  Please don’t give up the fight; we who have been following events closely believe in you and the righteous path you’re following.

I would be more than thrilled to hear back from you!  For that reason, I include a S.A.S.E. for your convenience.  (I am an inveterate writer of letters.  In fact, my first “serious” letter, at the age of seven, was to J.F.K.’s widow in December of 1963.)

With highest regard,




Joyce McKenna
November 18, 2019

P.S.  I retired from teaching in 2016, after teaching Spanish in public high schools for 27 years.  I now volunteer at a cat shelter, and serve as the secretary for our town’s Historical Commission.  I stop short of offering to volunteer to work with you, much as I hold you in high esteem, because I do love living near the ocean in my quiet corner of the country. 

Saturday, September 21, 2019

Dear Mr. Browne

Jackson Browne
c/o Donald Miller
Donald Miller Management
12746 King Street
Studio City, CA. 91604

Dear Mr. Browne,

You may be unaware, but you and I are closing in on our 45thanniversary, that is, as musician and devoted fan.  Before we launch into fond reminiscences, we must temper our mood by quietly honoring two of your rock & roll contemporaries, Ric Ocasek and Eddie Money, who passed away last week.  As to the former, I owe a great debt of gratitude, for to hear any Cars’ tunes from the late 70’s is to instantly be transported back to my wedding reception in 1978.  If I remember correctly, it was my brother Chris who crafted a tape cassette playlist overwhelmingly favoring music by the Cars (“Just what I needed”, memorable melody but lyrics perhaps too imperfect to hail it as a wedding theme song), The Talking Heads (“Psycho Killer”, the lyrics of which also aren’t worth the exercise of interpretation, but as a wedding punch was an ambrosial antidote to the insane heat), Bruce, of course, and even more of course, YOU.  Your Pretender album was still causing us fans to weep with sorrow; in truth, it would become one of those albums that reflexively – and for all time – call to mind its sad circumstances.  And your “Running on Empty” album, of course, became everyone’s favorite.

I don’t know about you, but I could be running on empty, and I would still be proud of my nostalgic sensibilities.  Too bad I was wrapped up in final wedding preparations, otherwise I would have come to see you perform back then at the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant.  One irony is that for nearly 35 years I have lived within five miles of that accursed scourge of our beautiful coastal landscape.  To me it represents a ticking time-bomb, but for a long time I comforted myself with the thought that it would be taken off-line, as feebly promised by company executives, upon reaching its life expectancy.  Earlier this year, however, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission extended the plant’s license, so it seems – short of a disaster – that the year 2050 is the next best hope of shuttering the plant.  Now we “Citizens within a 10-mile radius” (familiarly known as C-10) naturally worry about concrete degradation.  Anti-nukes these days can’t seem to muster the same degree of righteous indignation that drew 20,000 protesters to Seabrook that June day in 1978.  I can rely on you, my stalwart friend, to keep up the good fight, though; don’t let the bastards grind you down.  (I will not dignify the phony Latin expression by writing it here.)

The first time that I attended one of your concerts was in September of 1977 when you played at the Cumberland County Civic Center in Portland, Maine.  Admittedly, your later recording (in fact, immediately upon departing Portland) of “Nothing but Time” fails to thrill me to the extent that “The Load Out/Stay” blend did that night as an encore, but your references to “rolling down 295 out of Portland, Maine, Still high from the people up there” have always produced a happy sensation when I hear the song.    My boyfriend George and I had a well-thought out plan of weekend camping and concert-going. Somewhere in this house I still have the two-sided, exhaustive checklist of camping gear.  We headed up Route 1 and as we were crossing the Tobin Bridge, a spray of water hit the windshield of our ’67 Mustang.  George instantly knew that his radiator had sprung a leak. His calm reaction was to tap his engine temperature gauge on the dashboard and declare, “When the needle reaches this point, I have to turn off the engine.”  I can’t overstate my sense of panic.  Breaking-down cars is one way to trigger it; being lost – a carryover from childhood – also provokes it, as much as I try to convince myself to instead view it as “an unexpected adventure.”  So, at a bend in the road in Revere, George pulled his car into the breakdown lane, and turned it off.  He handed me a long screwdriver, commanded me to use it. . . if necessary, and struck out on foot for an auto parts store.   I stood for half an hour, fending off every offer of help, and, really, there seemed to be a steady stream of concerned travelers. . . or potential abductors.

Memory escapes me, but I have a hazy recollection of George returning without whatever it was he sought; either that, or he realized that replacing the radiator in the breakdown lane of Route 1 was an unrealistic objective.  Thus, for the entirety of the trip we had to have a sufficient store of water constantly at the ready to keep filling the radiator.  We made it to the concert. . . loved it (even from seats located behind a conspicuous post). I can’t say that the camping was a total success; I remember very little about it, but there are a couple of photos in my collections that capture a couple of downcast young people.

With all the touring that you’ve done over the decades, I wonder if you remember summer of 1978 when you performed at Tanglewood in Lenox, Mass.; I believe it was your third appearance there.  For you it would have been memorable in that it was in the same year that your live album “Running on Empty” was released.  For me, an uncultured country girl accustomed to all things small scale, the experience was transformative.  Even though your concert at Tanglewood the year before had drawn a record-setting crowd for that venue, your August, 1978 reappearance brought in over 21,000 fans.   Lenox neighbors were still– closing in on a decade now of Tanglewood’s Popular Artist Series - grasping at strategies to cope with decibel levels and unprecedented numbers of attendees, who tended toward pot-smoking and standing on their chairs and screeching along with the band.  With my limited concert-going experience, I had by then at least learned what that pleasant fragrance wafting about our heads was.  

I don’t imagine that you’ve ever been in a situation that demanded a high degree of car repair skills.  Your skill set being what it is, I now arrive at the purpose of my letter.  I’d like to provide you with a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to stay at my house – just one night.  I can show you the wonders of a New England coastal town.  It’s at its best in the fall, and the tourists are largely absent (although in recent years the number of retired Nova Scotians lurching around in their over-sized RV’s has been sufficient to slow down local traffic to a maddening degree.) The contrast between New England and Southern California could not be more dramatic, both aesthetically and culturally.  (To begin, our street addresses don't use numbers that go up into the tens of thousands, like I notice your King Street address does.). Bringing things full circle, a visit to the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant will allow you to re-kindle your sense of outrage.  

My daughter thinks I’m a little bit “touched in the head” for writing to someone so famous, but then she knows how fond I am of sending letters via the U.S.P.S.  My earliest correspondence with a famous person was when I was 7 years old; I sent a letter of condolence to Jackie Kennedy, soon after her husband was assassinated.  I treasure the boilerplate response that the White House sent to me.

Well, I should sign off now.  I’m planning to pen a letter to Stephen Colbert, to ask him to invite you back to the Late Show.  It’s been over ten years since he put you on the hotseat about suing John McCain for his unpermitted use of “Running on Empty” in his smear campaign against Barack Obama.  I figure you’ll have plenty to catch up on, and you can promote your “Lantern Tour II”. I stand solidly with you in your disapproval of how the current Administration is handling migrants and refugees.  But don’t get me started on that!  I’ll save my indignation for my next letter to you.  Stay well, and let me know if you want a quintessential New England experience.  (Just go to my blog, and leave a comment at the end of this post.  Please feel free to follow me – I only have 12 followers, and if you join my small group of admirers, my credibility just might soar.)


Fondly,
Joyce
Scoscheofclass.blogspot.com

Friday, May 10, 2019

Water

When our house (the McKennas’) on Niko Way was built in 1998, we had an artesian well installed.  Don't laugh, but we even used the services of a water diviner.  It was a little kooky watching him move slowly around the yard, intently watching his divining rod, but who am I to dismiss the method as bunk.  I don’t remember precisely how far down the well installers had to drill, but it was somewhere between 200 and 300 feet.  Now some of you may shrug at this claim, but nothing compares to well water; it is oh-so-delicious.  The Guatemalan mason who put in our stone patio ten years ago nodded approvingly, murmuring “agua de pozo” (well water), when I encouraged him to drink water right from the house spigot.  People in the know have a great appreciation for well water.  It goes without saying, however, that there’s a responsibility to test periodically for carcinogens, and we here on Niko Way are mindful of the trace quantities of arsenic that show up when we test our water.  The back of our property nestles against the former Boston & Maine railroad corridor, and railroad corridors have been notorious for emitting toxins into the ground.

As I look at the spot in our yard where the cap for our well sits, I’m reminded of my early introduction to artesian wells and the “sweet nectar” that they draw from the ground.  At our Titicut home, the well sat at the top of our driveway, to the right side, relatively close to the Library.  It had a little wood frame house, and we were instructed to stay clear of it.  Don’t open the door, don’t enter it, don’t touch the boards on the ground covering it, don’t throw things down it; in fact, just don’t go anywhere near it.  We, of course, took that as an invitation to do just that.  We removed the boards that covered the well, and peered straight down, hoping just once to be able to discern its depths.  We listened carefully, and then shouted into that space. Science was hard at work when you cast words or strings of words down that shaft.  You learned about the persistence of sound; the irregular rock siding assured a playful continuation of your notes.  “Helloooo” galloped joyfully down the cylindrical tract; on the other hand, “Chris is a stupid-head”, with its fricative sounds, fittingly ricocheted and smashed its way along the same path. A lot of stupid statements were dropped into that space. And I admit, I dropped rocks down there. They were little, so.

In the kitchen, next to the enormous double basin cast iron sink in one corner was an old cast iron "pitcher pump".  It operated as an offshoot of our artesian well; when primed with - you guessed it - water, the suction thus created allowed it to draw water from a cistern located behind the kitchen.  You pump-pump-pumped, and a rush of water then cascaded from its spout as if by magic.  Eventually, we were able to modernize our plumbing, and the pump, along with accompanying lead pipe, was removed.  It’s probable that the cistern itself still remains on the property, well hidden in the ground. Chris, perhaps as a hide-and-seek gambit, remembers lowering himself into its belly.  Which all brings to mind a common enough occurrence that I must ask: how many times did my older brothers (in a “joke’s on you” maneuver) simply vacate the premises in the middle of a hide-and-seek game?  Yuh, mm-hmm, I thought so.  To this day, there's a part of me that is still, reflexively, searching for them.

I wouldn’t go so far as to say that the hand pump was “popular” in that day and age, but you were more apt to see them outside on farms.  These days, they have great retro appeal, and can be bought cheaply on Amazon.com.  I doubt, however, that the typical purchaser reflects on how useful they are in a power outage.  Despite their continued functionality, they’re more for decorative purposes, adding the “perfect touch” to any fountain, pond, or garden display.  At the very least, their presence shouldn't cause some mother to contemplate:  I wonder if my otherwise sensible son is sitting in the cistern.

Tuesday, April 2, 2019

The Morrisseys move to another very old house in Bridgewater



415 Titicut (as of 1949)
In 1959 the family moved from South Street to a little cape-style house just a few miles away on Titicut Street.  At the time, we were still a family of six.  Margaret would be born in 1960, followed two years later by Martin, and then another two years by Robert.  Surrounded by open fields on all sides, the seven-room house sat at perhaps the highest point in town; in fact, I have it on good authority that Titicut Hill is one of the highest elevations in Plymouth County.  Granted, a vast prison complex interrupted an otherwise expansive view, but few could find fault with those amazing sunrises and sunsets.  In no house since then have I found anything comparable.

One of the more unique features that our property boasted was the small graveyard (a magnet for all kinds of childhood activities) tucked in along the lot’s southern margin.  The lot was about one acre, with a windbreak of cedar trees that buffered against Noreasters. The day we arrived was a crisp, windy day in October; the lawn, I recall, was in severe need of mowing, and a massive tree stump in the front yard drew adult attention, specifically, how to remove it.  After months – maybe years – of axe-wielding by my older brothers that failed to reduce the stump in any measurable way, there was talk of applying more aggressive methods – first fire, then dynamite.  

As for structures, in addition to a house in desperate need of updating, there was a detached garage (that Mom learned well into her next pregnancy was just a little too narrow); there was also a semi-detached building that Dad converted into his “library”, which he filled to capacity with every imaginable history and geography reference book, atlas, and map.  One of its features, the recollection of which I would happily expunge, but that my older brothers remember with, um, fondness, was its “inhouse outhouse”.   While it seems that homeowners have a tendency to want to expand living space with additions (especially as the family expands), in time we adopted a “less is more” mindset; first the garage was reduced to rubble, then the library (with its consequent exodus of rats), and finally the porch.  

Having lived in earlier years on a farm with endless possibilities, our expectations were naturally high.  It is likely that we kids would have rebelled against our seemingly constricted living conditions had there not been a great deal of newness to explore, both inside and out.  Certainly the house and the lot it sat on were on a much reduced scale, but that fall we set about in earnest to uncover the quirks and captivating features of our new realm. 

Outdoors, we quickly found at least a few trees worthy of climbing. Of particular value – from a kid’s standpoint – were the maple at the back edge of the property and a Bartlett pear tree close to the front corner of the house on the north side.  In the early years we enjoyed scurrying up the tree and across the roof.  In later years we used it to sneak out of the house, taking the reverse route.  In season, that tree produced the best, juiciest pears I’ve ever had!  The perennial risk, however, was the occasional bee sting that you’d get when running across the lawn in bare feet; bees were just as in love with our Bartletts, and would get down to business with the smooshy, sweet pears that fell to the ground.  We kids, separately – and competitively, would track the progress of the ripening fruit. We would know the ones that held the greatest promise; from the ground, we judged size, shape, and likelihood of flesh perfection as the hot days of summer worked their magic.  It was a delicate balance; you had to be patient enough to allow for full maturity, but not wait one day over, for every other sibling was engaged in the same type of wordless maneuver.  Fraternal impatience, alas, spelled the untimely plucking of too many pears of great potential.

In contrast to the Bartlett tree, another pear tree in the back yard faithfully produced hard, barely consumable little fruits with tough skins.  We never knew – or cared to know – the name of that strain of pear; it was just always ever referred to as the “winter pear”.  We urchins may have devoted more surveillance time to our cherished Bartlett, but in late fall, pickins’ be slim; you ate what the land produced, gagging at times on undesirable inhabitants, or – conversely – taking delight in the occasional crisp, somewhat tart flesh of the winter pear.

One of my most uncomfortable memories is of the day that I decided to accelerate the maturation process (of the Bartlett), and in so doing nearly rendered my sister a vegetable.  I wanted to assist the tree in dropping one of its prizes, so I found a long, 4-prong potato fork, and hoisted it above my head in hopes of “harvesting” my target.  I wasn’t strong enough to impede or control its downward arc; it came crashing down into the top of Margaret’s skull.  Fearful of Mom’s reaction to fratricide by one of her own – it had never happened to our family before, that I know of, - I hesitated.  And, no, my temporizing wasn’t because I was contemplating flight, a new identity, and a shiny new life on the lam.  I just wanted to present the facts in as reassuring a manner as the circumstances would allow. . . so that Mom wouldn’t kill me.  Margaret is still with us, and by all observable measures is fully functioning, both physically and intellectually.  She’s way sharper than me, so I’m able to comfortably conclude “no harm, no foul”, and put the incident behind me. . . finally.  As you can see, it’s taken a long time.  Mea culpa, Marg.  I hope it doesn’t take another half-century to restore your faith and trust in me.

Friday, March 22, 2019

Learn to Skate

Behind the house at 1777 South Street were three ponds tucked into a wooded area.  They were imaginatively named “The First Pond”, “The Second Pond”, and “The Third Pond”. Rarely were they ideal for skating because the surface would perpetually be leavened with leaves, twigs and branches, or snow. For early efforts at learning to ice skate, however, they were perfect.  There were frozen streams, too, that connected the three ponds, allowing you to conveniently skate from one to the next.  I was forever pursuing my brothers, who without warning would all race off to the next pond.  I think I cried a lot when they did that, not because they didn’t see me as their equal, but because of scary woodland creatures who would then be able to easily pick me off.  And that comment about “equal”, how could they consider me one of the gang when, on the ice, all I managed to do was tentatively walk around – in my skates – with crooked ankles nearly grazing the ice, arms akimbo?  It was a style that forced my body to do splits every ten feet or so.  Whenever the command “move!” was issued as I crossed into areas where frenzied hockey action was taking place, I responded with a fresh startle reflex much like an infant who has been presented with a sudden loud noise or a bright light, my feet shooting out from under me and my arms splaying.   And I cried.  I was better at locating logs to sit on. . . and even better at experiencing hypothermia.  I should add that I did have an important role; whenever the puck sailed into the surrounding woods, I was sent to retrieve it.  Consequently, my skates required frequent sharpening. (pfff!  As if!). I grew up not very fond of skating. . . until I met David, and Johnson’s Pond in Raynham provided a new venue for that dance that teenage boys and girls do in large unsupervised groups.  My feet were just as cold then, too, but I didn’t mind. At least I didn’t cry.

Up for some shinny?

Have I mentioned that our family was BIG into hockey?  Well, it bears repeating.  All my brothers were groomed from an early age to be ice hockey players.  Mom and Dad imagined themselves, at least in the beginning, as devoted hockey parents.  So, I remember as a child watching my brothers in training, each, in turn, skating around the various ponds in Bridgewater, pushing a wooden kitchen chair in front of them.  Youngsters throughout Bridgewater likewise took to the area’s frozen bodies of water; there were several ponds and lakes that provided great conditions for skating: Carver Pond, Skeeter Mill Pond, Sturtevant’s Corner, and the Ice Pond (aka State Farm Pond).  It didn’t strike me as especially fun; therefore, despite all the enforced hours logged on area ponds, I never progressed.  Impressed as I was with Peggy Fleming, her moves just totally flummoxed me.  

The 1960’s and 70’s were the sweet spot, I believe, for pick-up games in which teams were naturally selected by blood ties.  The baby boom generation – lots of families with lots of kids – provided a ripe culture for casual team sports.  The Bruins’ success, too, in the early 70’s converted young spectators into NHL aspirants.  Although gear was optional, hockey gloves were one of the more prized pieces of equipment, given that rules of engagement were rather loose, and hands were constantly getting smashed.  It didn’t matter if they were mismatched, or had holes, or even fit properly.  On the other hand, a helmet, perhaps the most important appurtenance from a long-term health standpoint, was alarmingly absent. Although randomly assembled teams were a perfectly acceptable option, in many cases entire teams could be made up of a single family or a neighborhood combination of families.  Hence, there were rivalries that evolved rather organically; the Morrisseys and Maloneys, for example, nurtured a competitive relationship that regularly included family sponsored fighting.  Kevin, of course, in his typically zealous manner, nobly did his part for the Morrisseys.  As feared as he might have been by his foes, there was great admiration of his skill set, which extended even to ice surface management.  Few kids, for example, would risk submerging their own vehicles in order to clear the ice of snow.  As the baton was later passed to younger brothers Marty and Bob, the family names changed; the Heslin brothers and the Blakelys brought greater finesse and skill to the pond hockey scene.  At this point, kids could just generally boast a more expansive indoctrination.  Organized hockey had arrived in Bridgewater.

Pick-up style hockey continued to enjoy popularity in subsequent decades, but, naturally, the game has experienced a metamorphosis.  What we observe today is akin to a coming-of-age; rarely do we see genuine, improvised games on local ponds.  It catches our eye when we do see a small handful of kids with sticks in hand, movement back and forth between two makeshift goals on a suitably frozen pond.  Even the length of the season has shortened; in earlier years it might have been possible to take to the ice in November; extended periods of cold are much rarer these days.  

Baby boomers never really left their passion behind, however. Pick-up games now more readily conjure ice rink settings, and schedules are firmly set.  And if you live in cold winter states such as Minnesota or Colorado, outdoor pick-up tournaments, which draw thousands of participants and are often sponsored by big-name purveyors of beer, bring you that much closer to your unfulfilled dream of playing professionally.  They’re highly organized programs, with perimeter boards and goalie nets that are the real deal, (one even boasts Zamboni service!), so prepare accordingly.  Make sure you arrive with matching gloves, fashion forward attire, and a mouthguard for your few remaining original teeth.  

Thursday, February 7, 2019

A Durable Bond

This post originally appeared on my website (www.JoyHandbags.us/blog/) in March, 2018.

Very soon after I met George, it was important to me that he and my oldest brother Kevin meet.  (George had actually met my mother before he met me, as a work study assignment at the prison; she took good care of his skinny boned body by regularly feeding him sandwiches and other tasty morsels from the maximum security kitchen).  Kevin would say that I had, up to that point, made unwise decisions where it concerned boyfriend choices.  More accurately put, he would have used descriptors such as “asshole” or “puke” or “moron”.  He took seriously his responsibility to look out for me, and, really, what did I know about what was good for me. . .  beyond my academic record, that is?   And academics were always a most serious part of my life, but more on that later.   

It wasn't a bromance that I would have predicted.  These brothers-in-law shared a few key characteristics that should have made them constant irritants to each other; both were assertive, stubborn, opinionated, and first-born sons of large families.   Taking each other’s measure, they each recognized in the other a kindred fierceness that gave reason for eager expectation of fun times ahead, fun being a relative term; I invite you to imagine feisty, sometimes gloves off, intellectual jousting, ever more satisfying when you have an audience of conflict-averse siblings and in-laws.  From the beginning, and throughout their friendship, their interactions relied upon healthy, vigorous debate.  Those two could debate till the cows came home!  And with such fervor!  It took me a while, but I learned that their spirited discourse was a sign of mutual admiration, not displeasure.  The ways in which Kevin and George communed relied upon a couple of traits that they shared and which defined their close relationship:  passion for analysis and problem solving, and a love of being on the water. . . or ice.

A new boat and a new truck...

No sooner had George and I said, "we do", then the first gauntlet had been tossed down.  We had a brand new truck coinciding with one of Kevin's shiny new boats.  My boys were overly-excited to get over to Lake Nippenicket and spend a blissful day of escapist activity.  Let's pause here for what should be obvious clarification.  Deep within the brain stem of the average fisherman is an instinctual impulse; they must, I mean, absolutely MUST, be launching their vessel before daybreak.  And, also typical of fishermen (or so I imagine), is a reason-deprived state of mind that accompanies such an early hour.  Being men, they would not have paused to reflect on the nutritional returns of a balanced breakfast.  They would have instead sprung directly from bed to driveway, each expecting to be occupying the driver's seat in mere minutes.  Pre-daybreak tranquility was punctured by each of them forcefully claiming his right to drive the truck.  "It's my truck!" alternated with "It's my boat!"  And thus began a nearly forty-year partnership, one could say defined by a ball hitch.

Time can't diminish a true bond...

Summer 1978 sits apart in my memories for so many reasons, most of them really good.  It wasn't the only period marked by pre-dawn exchanges between George and Kevin, but, as years passed and "family generation" became the top concern for both families, their escapades became more episodic.  Sometime after 2006, however, when face-to-face time became more exquisitely consequential, the two friends renewed the taut bond that had always tethered them together.  

"Hard Water" on a Plymouth Lake...

Kevin's latest amusement was ice boating.   Being the engineer, it made perfect sense that he would design and build his own ice boat.  When Kevin invited George down for a day careening across his lake, that boy was out the door before there was even a tiny suggestion of sunrise.  With no experience, and perhaps with scant operational understanding, he was nevertheless an eager accomplice.   He came home at the end of that weekend with a clearly defined rectangularish bruise on his left buttock, having landed hard on his wallet as his only way to stop the dern thing.  (I've always felt that where it concerns Kevin, my dear husband was willing to abandon his wary approach to life; he trusted him unwaveringly.  Not a bad thing, really.)  Naturally, George’s adventure had thrilled and energized him, and he quickly jumped on board the design craze, excited to plan and construct his own boat.  Somewhere around this same time, my other brother Chris and his wife Priscilla gave him a retired sail that had already been idling away the years in their Berkshire lake cabana. 

George imagined a much different outcome than Life had in store for him.  Racing unfettered across a lake in Plymouth was as liberating an experience as one could hope for.   A small rectangular bruise was a welcome price to pay.  (Kevin, you can be a pain in the ass at times, but my heart pinches just a bit when I contemplate the special friendship that you and George had, and the one-of-a-kind experiences that only you, and I mean, ONLY you, could concoct for him.)  Sadly, the red and white furled sail languished for twelve years in our garden shed.  I just couldn't part with it, but I had no idea what to do with it.  An iceboat was not one of my plans.

A brittle and stained sail...

I have followed the success of the Sea Bags line for years now.  They make sturdy totes out of upcycled sails.  One day when they were but a dewy-eyed start-up, I peered through their windows in Portland Maine and considered their future.  Because I saw their trajectory as not so different from my own, or at least what I imagined as my own, I privately prayed for them to "make it".  They HAVE made it.  I haven't...yet.  

When my daughter Megan and I lowered the little red and white Berkshire sail from the rafters of our shed this week I was so hopeful that there was sufficient life in it so that it could be molded into something new.   I gambled and put it through the wash, and set it out to dry.  In the end, there was precious little to be redeemed.  Most of it was too brittle and stained to be of any use.  

Berkshire sail cum picnic bucket
Ultimately, though, I have an adorable picnic bucket that can be of little value to anyone but me. It may sedately perch on a gentle dune at Duxbury Beach or a gentle incline on the banks of the Merrimac River.  It won't be asked to finesse the winds on a Plymouth lake, but I'll not stay my imaginings if they press me to envision a pair of ecstatic, unrepentant old geezers sailing across the "hard water" of an off-the-beaten-path lake in Plymouth, Massachusetts.